بایگانی برچسب برای: حسین حیدرپور

پرسش و پاسخ با گلن نیلی-87

Is NEoWave suitable for individual Stocks?

ANSWER:

Both NEoWave and orthodox Elliott Wave depend on mass psychology to create identifiable price patterns that are then used to predict the future. The smaller a company, the less liquid its stock (i.e., the smaller its float) and therefore the less its price action reflects mass psychology. 

In general, I don’t recommend using wave theory to predict individual stocks. Wave theory works best when applied to stock indicies such as the S&P 500, Russell 1000, the Nasdaq, the Dow Jones Industrial average or any average that reflects a country’s top companies. 

If you are going to use wave theory to predict the action of an individual stock, I recommend you reserve it for companies with one billion in market capitalization or higher. Any mid-cap company should fall into that category.

پرسش و پاسخ با گلن نیلی-86

Sometimes b-waves are larger than a-waves, sometimes they are the same size and sometimes they are smaller than a-waves. Does it mean anything?

ANSWER:

Under NEoWave, in any Flat or Zigzag, the size of wave-b provides crucial information regarding the size of the future trend. 

In Flats, the larger wave-b, the larger the post-Flat trend; the smaller wave-b, the smaller the post-Flat trend. If wave-b of a Flat is larger than wave-a, the post-Flat trend will be at least equal to the pre-Flat trend and frequently 161.8% or more. 

In Zigzags, the closer wave-b is to 61.8% of wave-a, the greater the chances wave-c will be smaller than wave-a. The smaller wave-b is in a Zigzag, the greater the chances wave-c will be 161.8% of wave-a.

پرسش و پاسخ با گلن نیلی-85

Before every trade, all of us experience many emotions, which create false trades with failure to follow NEoWave rules. How are you fighting emotions?

ANSWER:

This question was sent in from the Ukraine by Vyacheslav Shakhaylo. To properly answer, I need to divide traders into two, distinct groups – those who focus on “predicting markets and being right” and those who focus on “making money and protecting capital.” The second group, as a rule, is much more successful than the first. 

If you invest a significant amount of time and energy into something that does not pan out, it tends to make one emotional. If you invest hours, days, weeks or months into a particular market scenario, even telling your friends and family what you think, you might get very emotional (and embarrassed) when that forecast turns out wrong. As a result, for many in group 1, the fear of being wrong can be greater than the fear of taking a loss. As a result, that is typically what they end up doing. 

The second group devotes a great deal of time devising strategies that protect capital and make money, so they tend to be most emotional when they lose money. To avoid that “pain,” they tend to cut their losses quickly, which in the end is the ONLY way to first survive, and eventually win, the trading game. 

Using the above as a guide, there are three RULES you should follow to reduce your emotionalism when trading.

RULE #1 – Do NOT risk more than 1% of total capital on any one trade. During your learning period, I recommend 0.5%. This means your losses per trade will be so small (compared to your total capital) that it becomes fairly easy to trade without emotion. 

RULE #2 – Spend much less time analyzing (with the goal to predict) markets and much more time focusing on how you will enter, place stops, move stops and exit your position. 

RULE #3 – STOP telling your friends and relatives what you believe a market will do in the future. This will remove a great deal of trading pressure, thereby allowing you to change your mind or your straegy at a moments notice, when necessary, without the fear of retaliation or humiliation.

پرسش و پاسخ با گلن نیلی-84

Must the 2-4 trendline be drawn across the END of waves-2 and 4 or across the lowest points of waves-2 or 4?

ANSWER:

Asked by a customer in Madrid, Spain, this question is about channeling. Channeling is a great tool for locating the termination of waves-2 and 4 in an impulsive pattern. 

Under NEowave, no part of wave-3 should break the 2-4 trendline (this rule is not part of orthodox Elliott Wave). This means wave-2 (under NEoWave) must always end AT or AFTER the point where price action touches the final 2-4 trendline. In addition, wave-4 must also complete AT or AFTER the point where some of its structure touches the 2-4 trendline.

If you follow the above rules, you will find yourself changing counts less often and the patterns you confirm tend to remain correct. If you don’t adhere to these NEoWave rules, count changes will be more frequent, forecasts less accurate and the entire wave-counting process much more frustrating.

پرسش و پاسخ با گلن نیلی-83

Can an X wave take place after a Flat even if the Flat does not channel “perfectly”?

ANSWER:

This question refers to the NEoWave concept of “touch points.” In Flats and Zigzags, there are only four (4) possible touch points along the two channels – the beginning of the pattern (point zero), wave-a, wave-b and wave-c. When any Flat or Zigzag has all of its touch points touching one of the two channels, under NEoWave it qualifies as “perfect channeling.” When a Flat or Zigzag channels perfectly, it tells us an x-wave will follow and the pattern will become part of a larger, more complex correction (like those shown in Chapter 8 of Mastering Elliott Wave). 

What the question above is asking is can an X-wave follow a Flat or Zigzag even if it does not channel perfectly…the answer is YES. But, keep in mind, an x-wave is mandatory when channeling is perfect, only possible when channeling is not perfect.

پرسش و پاسخ با گلن نیلی-82

What is the maximum length of wave-c in an Elongated Flat and can wave-c be a Terminal in such a pattern?

ANSWER:

In a typical Flat, wave-c is normally a little longer or a little shorter than wave-a. As a result, it is unacceptable to allow wave-c to be more than 161.8% of wave-a in any standard Flat. 

The one characteristic that distinguishes a normal Flat from an elongated Flat is the size of wave-c in relation to wave-a. As wave-c reaches 161.8% of wave-a, it moves into “elongated” territory. The maximum acceptable length of wave-c in an elongated Flat is around 261.8%. Beyond that, some other pattern is probably forming.

Elongated Flats should only be allowed as a single segment of a larger Triangle, Diametric, Symmetrical or one phase of a Complex Correction. Lastly, an elongated c-wave can be a Terminal, but it must be the last leg of a larger formation.