ANSWER:

It is a NEoWave axiom that markets always move the fastest in the direction of the psychological trend (which can be independent of the price trend). For example, if Gold rallies $100 in 100 days, then declines $50 in the next 100 days, the psychological trend is up. 

Where NEoWave diverges from orthodox Elliott Wave, and most practitioners of technical analysis, is that this concept holds true EVEN IF the move in the direction of the trend is smaller. For example, if Gold rallies $100 in 100 days, and then is followed by a $150 decline over 200 days, NEoWave still assumes the psychological “trend” is UP because the $100 up move has a greater price/time ratio. Under NEoWave, the faster $100 move is “with the trend” (probably wave-A of a Flat in this case) even though it is smaller in price. The $150 move is slower, so usually “counter-trend” and will probably wave-B of a Flat in this situation. 

When I study wave charts, what is MOST important and what I look for first is the largest, fastest move on the chart. That is where I then begin my analysis. From there I make the assumption that largest, fastest move is WITH the trend (which means it must be wave-1, 3, 5, A, C, E, G or I and cannot be wave-2, 4, B, D, F, H or X). By applying time and retracement rules to what is left, you can almost always begin your wave analysis from the right place with the correct labels. This is the reason I virtually never have alternate wave counts on my Forecasting services (unlike most orthodox Elliott Wave practitioners) and why my wave counts usually stay on track for such long periods.

ANSWER:

In Mastering Elliott Wave (MEW) I cover general TIME relationships as they apply to impulsions and corrections, but a more sophisticated perspective has emerged since I wrote MEW nearly 20 years ago. Below is a description of how TIME behaves in Flats, Zigzags, Triangles, Diametrics, Symmetricals and Impulsions.

FLATS and ZIGZAGS (3 segment patterns)

1. The time differences between waves in Flats and Zigzags is greater than in any other correction.

2. If waves-a and b are about equal in time, wave-c will usually equal a+b in time.

3. If wave-b is much larger than wave-a in time, wave-c will equal the time of (a+b)/2.

4. Wave-b can NEVER take less time than wave-a in a Flat or Zigzag. 

5. Based on the above, this means wave-c always takes more time than wave-a in Flats and Zigzags.

6. Over all other corrections, Zigzags allow for the greatest price differences between waves. 

TRIANGLES (5 segment patterns)

1. Time differences between waves in a Triangle continue to be measurable, but are less obvious than what is seen in Flats and Zigzags.

2. If waves-a and b are about equal in time, wave-c will equal a+b in time.

3. If wave-b is much larger than wave-a in time, wave-c will equal the time of (a+b)/2.

4. Wave-b is allowed to take less time than wave-a IF it is smaller than wave-a in price. If it does, it almost always means the Triangle will possess what I call NEoWave Reverse Alternation (read about this in the Question of the Week section by doing a search for “Reverse Alternation”). 

5. Based on the above, this means wave-c always takes more time than wave-a in Flats and Zigzags.

DIAMETRICS (7 segment patterns)

1. These patterns began to appear in the early 90’s as the market’s way to adjust to the increasing popularity of wave theory (too many people were looking for the same things, so the market created new ways of behaving). 

2. They were the first patterns I witnessed where most wave segments took about the same amount of time, with one or two of the waves consuming a little more (or little less) time than the others. 

3. While most waves consume a similar amount of time, they do NOT consume a similar amount of price. A Diametric will possess an obvious expansionary or contractionary bias during the first four waves of the pattern; that bias will reverse during the second half of the formation. 

SYMMETRICALS (9 segment patterns)

1. This pattern emerged around 2001 as the S&P went through its transition from a bull to bear market for the first time in more than a decade. 

2. Their unique characteristic is that most of their waves consume about the same amount of time and price. Two of the waves may consume a little more (or a little less) time than the others and two of the waves (possibly the same two) will consume a little more (or a little less) price than the others. 

3. Of all patterns, Symmetricals all for the least price and time differences between waves. 

What we can derive from the above list, which is a NEoWave discovery, is that 3-segment corrections allow for the greatest time differences. As you move through 5, 7 and 9 segment formations, the allowed price and time differences continue to diminish with Symmetricals allowing for the least price and time differences between waves.

ANSWER:

Over the last 3 years, I’ve answered more than 100 important questions in this forum on NEoWave, its relation to Elliott Wave, on pattern development, wave relationships and new NEoWave phenomenon. 

With the recent addition of a SEARCH function you can use this “Question of the Week” forum to easily find answers to many of your burning questions. Simply type in a few keywords in the “Search” window at left. In seconds you will be presented with a list of possible answers. Read the title of each to quickly decide if it addresses your query. 

You are invited to use this valuable resource, any time, 24-hours-a-day. Best of all, you don’t have to be a subscriber to benefit – its FREE to the public!