پرسش و پاسخ با گلن نیلی-89

Which charting service do you recommend in order to get the best cash data plot?

ANSWER:

This is a great question sent in by a customer in Bahrain. It took me a long time to find a reliable, cash data source that allows me to copy and paste values into Excel, which then is used to draw ALL the charts you see in all NEoWave Trading and Forecasting services.

The service I recommend is BarChart.com which costs about $20/month. The symbols I use to get the cash data for the markets I follow are…

S&P – $INX

Notes – V2Y0 (who knows what that is supposed to stand for)

Gold – GCY0

Euro – ECY0

You can sign up for this service at www.barchart.com 

I don’t get anything out of recommending this service, but tell them NEoWave sent you, anyway.

پرسش و پاسخ با گلن نیلی-88

You mention in Mastering Elliott Wave, on page 5-25, the concept of touchpoints within a Triangle. How important is this rule and does it always apply?

ANSWER:

The NEoWave Rule of Touchpoints is essential to good pattern development. Many times I’ve seen orthodox Elliott Wave analysts encase contracting (or expanding) price action where every wave segment (0-A-B-C-D-E) is touching one of the two channels; instantly I know that count will eventually have to be changed. 

Under NEoWave, contracting and expanding Triangles should never have more than two touchpoints on the top channel and two on the bottom channel. This means waves-B and D will create the baseline, but the start of the Triangle (point 0) will not fall on the same channel. On the other side, either waves-A and C or C and E will create a channel (rarely will it be waves-A and E), but the third of the three will NOT touch the channel. Following the above channeling rules is essential for reliable forecasting and stable wave structure. 

Whenever you see a Triangle channel perfectly you know something will happen to delay its conclusion and the pattern will simply get more complex. It is possible for a Zigzag or a Flat to channel perfectly. This is where points 0 and B and A and C all touch parallel trendlines. But, any time a Flat or Zigzag channels perfectly, it tells you that pattern will be followed by an X-wave to become part of a larger, more complex corrective formation (see Chapter 8 of Mastering Elliott Wave).

پرسش و پاسخ با گلن نیلی-87

Is NEoWave suitable for individual Stocks?

ANSWER:

Both NEoWave and orthodox Elliott Wave depend on mass psychology to create identifiable price patterns that are then used to predict the future. The smaller a company, the less liquid its stock (i.e., the smaller its float) and therefore the less its price action reflects mass psychology. 

In general, I don’t recommend using wave theory to predict individual stocks. Wave theory works best when applied to stock indicies such as the S&P 500, Russell 1000, the Nasdaq, the Dow Jones Industrial average or any average that reflects a country’s top companies. 

If you are going to use wave theory to predict the action of an individual stock, I recommend you reserve it for companies with one billion in market capitalization or higher. Any mid-cap company should fall into that category.

پرسش و پاسخ با گلن نیلی-86

Sometimes b-waves are larger than a-waves, sometimes they are the same size and sometimes they are smaller than a-waves. Does it mean anything?

ANSWER:

Under NEoWave, in any Flat or Zigzag, the size of wave-b provides crucial information regarding the size of the future trend. 

In Flats, the larger wave-b, the larger the post-Flat trend; the smaller wave-b, the smaller the post-Flat trend. If wave-b of a Flat is larger than wave-a, the post-Flat trend will be at least equal to the pre-Flat trend and frequently 161.8% or more. 

In Zigzags, the closer wave-b is to 61.8% of wave-a, the greater the chances wave-c will be smaller than wave-a. The smaller wave-b is in a Zigzag, the greater the chances wave-c will be 161.8% of wave-a.

پرسش و پاسخ با گلن نیلی-85

Before every trade, all of us experience many emotions, which create false trades with failure to follow NEoWave rules. How are you fighting emotions?

ANSWER:

This question was sent in from the Ukraine by Vyacheslav Shakhaylo. To properly answer, I need to divide traders into two, distinct groups – those who focus on “predicting markets and being right” and those who focus on “making money and protecting capital.” The second group, as a rule, is much more successful than the first. 

If you invest a significant amount of time and energy into something that does not pan out, it tends to make one emotional. If you invest hours, days, weeks or months into a particular market scenario, even telling your friends and family what you think, you might get very emotional (and embarrassed) when that forecast turns out wrong. As a result, for many in group 1, the fear of being wrong can be greater than the fear of taking a loss. As a result, that is typically what they end up doing. 

The second group devotes a great deal of time devising strategies that protect capital and make money, so they tend to be most emotional when they lose money. To avoid that “pain,” they tend to cut their losses quickly, which in the end is the ONLY way to first survive, and eventually win, the trading game. 

Using the above as a guide, there are three RULES you should follow to reduce your emotionalism when trading.

RULE #1 – Do NOT risk more than 1% of total capital on any one trade. During your learning period, I recommend 0.5%. This means your losses per trade will be so small (compared to your total capital) that it becomes fairly easy to trade without emotion. 

RULE #2 – Spend much less time analyzing (with the goal to predict) markets and much more time focusing on how you will enter, place stops, move stops and exit your position. 

RULE #3 – STOP telling your friends and relatives what you believe a market will do in the future. This will remove a great deal of trading pressure, thereby allowing you to change your mind or your straegy at a moments notice, when necessary, without the fear of retaliation or humiliation.

پرسش و پاسخ با گلن نیلی-84

Must the 2-4 trendline be drawn across the END of waves-2 and 4 or across the lowest points of waves-2 or 4?

ANSWER:

Asked by a customer in Madrid, Spain, this question is about channeling. Channeling is a great tool for locating the termination of waves-2 and 4 in an impulsive pattern. 

Under NEowave, no part of wave-3 should break the 2-4 trendline (this rule is not part of orthodox Elliott Wave). This means wave-2 (under NEoWave) must always end AT or AFTER the point where price action touches the final 2-4 trendline. In addition, wave-4 must also complete AT or AFTER the point where some of its structure touches the 2-4 trendline.

If you follow the above rules, you will find yourself changing counts less often and the patterns you confirm tend to remain correct. If you don’t adhere to these NEoWave rules, count changes will be more frequent, forecasts less accurate and the entire wave-counting process much more frustrating.